AI shifts from asset to liability for midterm candidates

Artificial intelligence has moved from a campaign asset to a source of tension for midterm candidates. Chris Borick, a political science professor at Lehigh University, said the issue has become central to several races in the last few months. He noted that the political rhetoric around the technology has shifted sharply from the neutral stance politicians usually take toward new tools.

Borick said the change occurred over the past year. He described a move from positive to negative positions in both red and blue states. He attributed the shift to public concerns about the economy and local communities.

"We like tech traditionally as part of our political economy. That’s really changed in the last year, where you see a much more neutral and sometimes negative political position on AI," Borick said.

Shobita Parthasarathy, a public policy professor at the University of Michigan, said Republican candidates have aligned closely with AI companies for over a year. She said that alignment has shaped their messaging. Parthasarathy noted that Republicans generally focus on cost and limit discussion on wider issues. They are less likely to propose a moratorium.

Parthasarathy said this approach contrasts with how the parties handle the topic. She stated that Republicans are trying to limit the scope of the debate. This strategy differs from the broader policy discussions seen on the other side.

Borick pointed to local elections where voters oppose data centers. He said conservatives, liberals, Republicans, and Democrats often join forces against these projects. He said this coalition creates the potential for political realignment.

A poll of Iowa and Ohio voters published by SEMAFOR found a large majority want more regulation of AI. The results were posted online this week.